California Small Telephone Companies
General Rate Case Plan

Background

Small telephone companies in California that participate in the California High Cost Fund-A program are required to file General Rate Case applications with the CPUC.
The High Cost Fund-A is a subsidy program based on the principle of universal service -- the concept that basic telephone service should be affordable and ubiquitously available, including in rural, high-cost areas

In December 2014, the CPUC issued a Scoping Ruling requesting stakeholder input on its Proposed Rate Case Plan that would guide the rate case process for the small telephone companies, including:  

  • Schedule of Rate Case cycles 
  • Guidelines for Data Requests and Notice of Intent to file a Rate Case 

On June 25, 2015, the CPUC issued a Decision adopting a final Rate Case Plan and Schedule, as well as determining:  

  • Rate Case Benchmarks and Timelines. 
  • Any telephone company that does not file a Rate Case application during the first year of their scheduled cycle must obtain a CPUC exemption.  
  • Subsequent Rate Cases will continue on the same cycle formation schedule in future years. 

 

ORA Position

ORA supports the Governor’s directive to process the rate cases of small telephone companies on a timely basis. The CPUC’s adopted Rate Case Plan is largely consistent with ORA’s Rate Case Plan proposal, which proposed to:   

  • Establish a schedule for the 14 small telephone companies to file their Rate Case across the next  three years. 
  • Allow ORA to develop a list of Minimum Data Requirements that the phone company must provide before filing their formal Applications. 
  • Utilize a consolidated Cost of Capital proceeding first to determine the companies’ rates of return, in order to enhance the efficiency of the Rate Case process.  

While the CPUC's Rate Case Plan Decision declined to give ORA the authority to reject the pre-Application for the purpose of curing deficiencies, it did give this responsibility to its Communications staff and allow ORA to provide staff with input on any deficiencies. 

See ORA’s June 15, 2015 Opening Comments on CPUC's Proposed Decision. 

See ORA’s June 22, 2015 Reply Comments on CPUC's Proposed Decision.
 
 

See ORA's January 9, 2015 Opening Comments 

See ORA’s January 14, 2015 Reply Comments. 


 

Proceeding Docket 

See the Proceeding docket. 


 

Other Resources

ORA's California High Cost Fund-A Portal Webpage